User blog comment:DJay32/Calling All Wiki-Folk (specifically the ones who like to help out!)/@comment-28939893-20161212065943/@comment-1988716-20170117002935

A portrayal of something is technically an interpretation of a concept, but that's a very specific definition of "interpretation." Portrayal is the right word for the Wiki's context, for the reasons I went over in the blog post.

It is not exactly easy to standardize a disparate group of abstract concepts, which is what we are implicitly doing just by having a mythos at all, and what we are implicitly definitely doing by having a Wiki. Inconsistencies will be present, as they are difficult to avoid, especially for a Wiki which tries to cover "everything that has been written for the mythos" without ruling out possibilities for "anything else that can be written for the mythos."

I don't quite remember the context for "keeping Fear interpretations around." Are we? If we are, we're probably not supposed to be. What is the context for it?